In Brief...

Forests are vital to the Earth’s carbon cycle, absorbing carbon dioxide (CO₂) and storing its carbon in trees and other vegetation as they grow. Organic material in forest soils also acts as a significant reservoir of carbon. However, centuries of deforestation have undermined the capacity of forests to regulate the Earth’s CO₂ levels and have contributed to the release of billions of tonnes of CO₂ as trees and soils are destroyed.

In response, there is growing interest in forest-based climate strategies: conserving existing forests, reforesting damaged areas, and establishing new forests on previously unforested land through afforestation.

While each approach plays a vital role in removing or avoiding emissions and preserving biodiversity, viewing tree planting as a silver bullet for tackling global warming overlooks the vast scale of land and water required for forests to make a meaningful impact.

 

Key Points
Nature's Short-term Carbon Cycle

What are the processes by which forests pull CO2 from the atmosphere, and put it back?


Trees and plants absorb CO2 from the atmosphere through photosynthesis, converting it into glucose and oxygen:

photosynthesisphototosynthesis2

 

The glucose produced during photosynthesis is used by the plant in two main ways.

1. It can be directly converted into the energy required for the plant's life processes through the process of respiration, resulting in the release of CO2 back into the atmosphere:

respirationrespiration 2


2. Some glucose will be converted into more complex organic molecules to construct the plants' biomass as they grow:

Formation of cellulose - storing carbon in plant matter

It is the carbon contained in these molecules which accounts for the ability of all plants to act as carbon stores.

 

As trees and other vegetation die and decay, they release stored carbon back into the atmosphere. Decomposition is a natural process where dead plant material, including fallen leaves, branches, and entire trees, is broken down by bacteria and fungi, releasing CO2 as they consume the plant matter. This balance between growth, respiration, and decay underscores the importance of both preserving existing forests and encouraging new forest growth for effective carbon management.

This illustrates that forests are dynamic systems, with trees at different stages of growth playing varying roles in carbon uptake and storage. Younger, rapidly growing trees are particularly good at absorbing CO2 from the atmosphere. As these trees grow taller and thicker, they store large amounts of carbon in the organic material used to build their trunks, branches, and roots. 

The Impact of Humans on Forests

The growth of natural forests across thousands of years has resulted in the removal of billions of tonnes of CO2 from the atmosphere to be stored in the bodies of trees, other vegetation and soil. However, human intervention in recent centuries has led to the destruction of vast areas of forests, as the requirements of land for agriculture and the need for timber as a building material have been met by cutting down trees, causing the release of billions of tonnes of CO₂, as well as the loss of precious and unique forest habitat.

According to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020, the world lost 178 million hectares of forest from 1990 to 2020. The rate of net forest loss has decreased significantly over this period:

In the 1970s conservationists succeeded in drawing international attention to the plight of the world’s forests, especially the rate of deforestation which was taking place in the Amazon rainforest.  When the world’s other hot environmental issue of the late 20th century, global warming, began to emerge, the two topics became increasingly intertwined due to the increasing understanding of the role forests play in regulating the climate. Despite growing awareness, there has been a persistent lack of concerted international action to address either issue effectively.

↑ top
Repairing Forests

How can we begin to reverse the damage inflicted on the world's forests over hundreds of years? Is it possible to restore at least some deforested land to its original condition or should we concentrate on preventing further destruction? From a carbon removal perspective, would it be better to create new plantations of trees with fast growing species which will pull CO2 out of the air more rapidly than mature forests?

In terms of forest conservation and reforestation, human intervention is aimed at protecting and repairing existing natural forests. These are forests which have developed over hundreds or possibly thousands of years with minimal human intervention, except potentially for the presence of indigenous communities who practice sustainable forest management. These forests support incredibly complex ecosystems of plants, animals, and microorganisms adapted to the local conditions, while the presence of a diverse mix of tree species enhances the forest's resilience against diseases that may target a single species.
While many trees in natural forests are mature and grow more slowly, they continue to sequester carbon, albeit at a slower rate than younger forests. Importantly, natural forests represent an enormous carbon reservoir, storing vast amounts of carbon in both vegetation and soils.

Preserving existing forests and rejuvenating degraded ones often requires minimal human intervention - simply halting activities on the land and allowing natural processes to resume may suffice. Control measures may be necessary for invasive flora and fauna. For instance, naturalists at Yellowstone National Park found that reintroducing wolves—an apex predator that helps regulate herbivore populations—enabled vegetation to thrive, resulting in a remarkable recovery of plant life.

However, from the standpoint of those seeking rapid outcomes—such as capturing CO2 from the air to sell carbon credits—this minimal-intervention approach faces one key challenge: nature needs time to do its work. Financing a reforestation project through the sale of carbon credits for carbon which may not be absorbed for decades can be a hard sell, not helped by stories of unscrupulous developers exaggerating, or even fabricating the carbon storage potential of forests in order to justify selling carbon credits.

Meanwhile, afforestation is a technique aimed at establishing new forests where none previously existed. The motive may be commercial, growing so-called plantation forests to provide timber for construction or wood for burning at bioenergy plants. Other afforestation projects may have environmental goals, such as preventing or reversing mass desertification, or to increase river and groundwater levels to improve conditions for local farmers.
More recently, the concept of planting new forests for the express purpose of CO2 removal, where the CO2 estimated to have been captured can be sold in the form of carbon credits to companies and individuals who wish to offset their own emissions.
Unlike natural forests, which evolve over centuries and often contain a diverse array of tree species adapted to local conditions, plantation forests usually consist of a single species or a limited number of species selected for their commercial value, and not necessarily native to the area.

How effective plantation forests are at reducing CO2 levels depends on several factors:

Can New Forests Help?

While re-establishing degraded forests with diverse species of trees and encouraging native wildlife to return seems intuitively like a positive move for the environment on all fronts. Meanwhile, planting new forests where none previously existed, using a lesser variety of possibly non-native trees, can also be beneficial as long as it doesn’t come at the expense of other types of natural landscapes which have taken thousands or millions of years to evolve.

However from the perspective of creating artificial forests with the specific aim of removing CO2 from the air, how significant is their impact?

Estimates of how much CO2 is absorbed by forests range significantly, depending on the age of forests and the types of tree. A 2018 report entitled "Global carbon dioxide removal rates from forest landscape restoration activities" has estimated the range of CO2 sequestration rates for forests varies depending on the specific ‘forest landscape restoration’ (FLR) activity:

According to the report, the amount of CO2 sequestered by various forest types in one year during the first 20 years of each project is estimated to be:

So how do these figures stack up when compared to human emissions of CO2?

Current annual emissions of CO2 from human activity are estimated at around 35 billion tonnes, equating to 96 million tonnes per day.

Some rough calculations tell us that close to 2.5 million hectares of incredibly efficient forest —an area around the size of New Jersey or the island of Sardinia absorbing 40 tonnes of CO2 per hectare per year—would take a year to account for just one day's global CO2 emissions. While no forest is going to maintain that rate of CO2 absorption, it does give an idea of the scale of forestation which would be required to make a dent in the current elevated CO2 levels.

↑ top
Best Practices for Carbon-Focused Forest Restoration

Is it just a matter of planting as many trees as possible?
While large-scale tree planting is crucial for carbon sequestration, it's not as simple as planting trees indiscriminately. Effective forest restoration requires careful planning and consideration of various factors to ensure long-term success and maximum benefits.

The importance of creating resilient forests
Resilient forests are better equipped to withstand climate change impacts, pests, and diseases. This involves planting a diverse mix of native species adapted to local conditions. Biodiversity enhances forest resilience and provides additional ecosystem services beyond carbon sequestration.

Where should new forests be established?
Prioritize areas that were previously forested but have been degraded or deforested. Avoid planting trees in naturally treeless ecosystems like grasslands or wetlands, as this can harm biodiversity and potentially release more carbon than it sequesters. Consider factors such as soil quality, water availability, and proximity to existing forests.

Engaging local and indigenous communities
Successful forest restoration relies on the support and involvement of local communities. Engage them early in the planning process, incorporate traditional knowledge, and ensure they benefit from the restoration efforts. This can include creating jobs, improving livelihoods, and maintaining access to forest resources.

Set realistic and transparent targets
Set clear, realistic goals for carbon sequestration and biodiversity, and be transparent about how progress will be measured. This helps build trust with stakeholders and supports a more accurate evaluation of the project’s outcomes.

Measure and monitor carbon sequestration and biodiversity impacts
Implement robust monitoring systems to track carbon sequestration rates and biodiversity changes over time. This data is crucial for verifying the project's effectiveness, making necessary adjustments, and reporting outcomes to stakeholders and potential funders.

Take into account the full carbon lifecycle
Consider the entire carbon lifecycle of the restoration project. This includes emissions from site preparation, tree nurseries, and ongoing management activities. A comprehensive approach ensures that the net carbon benefit is accurately assessed.

Always prioritize broader conservation efforts
While reforestation is valuable, it should complement, not replace, efforts to conserve existing forests. Protecting mature forests often provides greater immediate carbon and biodiversity benefits than newly planted areas. Integrate reforestation into broader landscape-level conservation strategies for maximum impact.

Conclusion

Forests play an indispensable role in environmental and climate management, serving as vital carbon sinks and essential ecosystems. However, centuries of deforestation and land conversion have inflicted serious damage, leaving humanity with a substantial ecological debt.

While establishing new plantation forests can help ease pressure on natural forests, providing timber as well as biomass for energy—ideally with carbon capture—it is important to understand the sheer scale of tree planting which would be needed if we were to rely on it alone to solve the climate crisis. The land and water required would be immense, and the vulnerability of plantation forests to disease and wildfires means that long-term carbon storage is not guaranteed, particularly if trees are harvested and the stored carbon is subsequently released.

Planting trees is not a quick or simple fix, and forests alone cannot solve climate change. However, when done responsibly and as part of a broader strategy, reforestation and afforestation can still play a valuable role in reducing CO2 levels.

↑ top
Further Reading - External Links

 

More online resources...

See also: Projects | Research | Latest Updates | Glossary

Related Pages:
Overview
Projects
Research
Web Resources
Latest Updates
Glossary